[ register ]   user:    pass:   

PrenticeNet

all things Prentice/Prentiss/Prentis/Prentys/...

John Prentice of Charleston, SC


To see full list of articles in this Spring '98 Issue, Click Here
John Prentice of Charleston, South Carolina
By Linus Joseph Dewald Jr., Editr
Spring 1998 and Revised 18 Jan 2005

Is he Elder John Prentiss, 184/25?

In working with Aubrey "Buzz" Prentice is trying to identify the parents and ancestry of James Monroe Prentice who was born 14 Apr 1884 at Buffalo Valley, TN, he mentioned that family tradition has it that James came from South Carolina

In a related article on South Carolina Prentices is found a "John Prentice" of Charleston, likely the same person, in the 1790 and 1800 Charleston District census in St. Phillips and St. Michaels Parish.

The 1790 census says the household consists of 16 Free White Males over 16 and 2 under 16. No females.

The 1800 census, pg. 140, catagorizes the household as 00221-20000-00. That indicates:

  • 1 male over 45 and born before 1755.
  • 2 males 26-45 and born between 1755 and 1774.
  • 2 males 16-26 and born between 1774 and 1784.
  • 2 females 0-10 and born between 1790 and 1800.

The only family appearing in the 1810 SC census is that of "D. Prentice" in Charleston on pg. 208. That suggests that John may either have moved or died by 1810.

Also in the 1800 Charleston census, but on pg. 104, is James Otis Prentice who may be found on pg. 175 of our new PRENTICE book. James, a descendant of Thomas Prentice of Newton, MA, may, or may not, be related to John. James did have a brother named John, born c. 1740, but Binney's 1883 book says that he died by 1760 (pg. 173).

James also had another brother named John who was born in 1761, but he appears to be living in Lancaster, MA because of the birth of sons there in 1798 and 1801 (pgs. 173, 185-6). However, John is mentioned as "going to South Carolina to attend to some business for his brother James Otis Prentiss and the slaves on the plantation were fond of 'Massa John'." No year is given. (Pg. 174)

However, if John were there in 1790 and the place was a plantation, that might explain why the census showed 16 males over 16 and 2 under 16. John also had two young daughters under 10 in 1800 and the absence of an adult female might be explainable if John left the rest of his family in Lancaster, MA.

Correspondence:   If you have any information about the folks mentioned in this article, please send your information to us at the Prentice Newsletter. Be sure to give the full title and date of this article in the Subject line of the email.

Caution: If you don't use the above email link, your email to us may be deleted as spam by our email filter.


 
This page is maintained by PrenticeNet.
Comments:  Only registered members can add comments or contact contributors. (Register now?)
No comments on this page.
  Browse   Search  
Current visitors: 37
 

Based on your "USER AGENT" string, we have decided that you have an older browser, are a mobile device, or are a robot. Because of this you have been provided a limited functionality version of PrenticeNet. If this assumption is incorrect, please contact us and provide your user agent string.

USER_AGENT: Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)